Reports of the

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY

No. 35

PAPERS ON CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY: 4L-t!.6

Issued September 1, 1956

The University of California Archaeological Survey

Department of Anthropology

University of California
Berkeley 4, California

PAPERS ON CALIFORNIA ARCHAEOLOGY: 44-46

CONTENTS

Page

44. Francis A. Riddell

Final Report on the Archaeology
of Tommy Tucker Cave . . . .  .

Introduction.  . .  .  . .  . . . . .  .  .  . .  . . .  .  .
Artifacts recovered . . . . . . . . . . *. . . . . .

Discussion of artifact occurrence and distribution. .
Faunal remains.r . . 0  . . . 0 a 0  . . . . . a 0 a .0
Summary and conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bibliography,,.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

Explanation of Illustrations. . . . * . . . . . . . .

0
0

1
1
2
15
17
18
21
24

45. So Fe

Cook and A. B. Elsasser Burials in Sand Mounds of the

Delta Region of the Sacramento-

San Joaquin River System . . . .

Outline of mound complex.. ..      . .. * .  *

Artifacts associated with burials .          *
Burial posture.. * * .a. . .     .  *.  .

Sumary and conclusion. . . . .. . .....
Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . *.   * .

Explanation of Illustrations. . . . .....

0  .   0  0
0  0   *  0
*  .   .  .
0  *   0  0

.0     .

0 * * 0

0
0

26
26
34
142
42

44
46

47
54
54

46. Eugene A. Hammel

An Unusual Burial from Contra

Costa County . . e . . a a a . 0

Bibliogra,-phy. a * c c c . * * *. * . . . . .
Explanation of Illustration . . . . * . . . .

Illustrations and Tables

~~~~-     ,   .---

0   0.      a   0
*   E       *   0

Following page

Paper No. I
Map 1.

Plate I.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

414

Plan of Tonmy Tucker Cave .........
Airtifacts from Tommy Tucker Cave.. . .

Cross-section of cave deposit . . . . . . .

Schematic representation of mouth of cave and
wicker basket fragment. . . . . . . . . . .
Pictograph (Feature 1) . . . . . . .      .

Abalone and mussel shell ornaments and beads.
Bone Pendants and Pins. . . . . . . . . ..
Plain and incised bone pins . . . . . .

*.0 0 0 0 0
* a * a 0 0

*  0 * *

drawing

*0 a *

.  0

of

0 0

Figure
Figure
Figure
Figure

3.
4.
5.
6.

.   *   *

.   .   .   0

0 a         0 *
.       .   .

0
0
Sw

25
25
25
25
25

Page

11
12
13
14

Table 1.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Table 4.

Projectile points
Twine and cordage
Depth differences
Depth differences.

(data)         a
(data) 0 a

(various artifacts) . . . .
(projectile points) . . * *

. . 0 0 0

0    0 *

.  0*      0

.  . 0   .

0

- i-

Illustrations and Tables     (cont ' d)

Following page

Paper No. 1
Map 1.

Plate 1.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

6z5

Delta area sand mound burial sites. .  . . . . . *. .
Burials and artifacts from CCo-146 and

artifacts from San Benito County. . . . .  . .  . . . .

Artifacts from CCo-146, Sac-104, and San Benito County.
Artifacts from CCo-137 and Sac-211.. . *  . . . .

27

46
46
46

page

Table 1.   Burial occurrence in sixteen sand mound sites

the Delta region. . . . . .   .   .   .   * .

Table 2.  Sumary of burials exposed at CCo-146 . .    .
Table 3.   Occurrences of Type C.(1). and related types

of Haliotis ornaments * .. .. . . .. .... .  *

in

.  .  .  .  .
* . . 0 *

* . . U*

35
37
41

Following page

Paper No.
Figure 1.

46

Bone whistles from site CCo-15. * . . 0 0 . . 0 . . 0 .

54

Page

51
52

Table 1.  Data on bone whistles (general) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Table 2.  Data on bone whistle holes . * .* ..... *      . * * * .*.

-ii-